Pages

Monday, November 1, 2010

On what they are really discussing Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva?

The case of small-Lucia no longer appears at the base of the legal controversy between Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva : TMZ revealed that the real question is Icon the Trust. And that would Codest? You ask.

A trivial questioncella hereditary, with so many pennies in transit, for a change. In short, years ago, Mel and Robyn Gibson (ex-wife) had been the Icon Trust to arrange passage to the inheritance had seven children. Only the exact words, on the act of creation were "offspring born by Mel O by Robyn." Of course at that time no one imagined that one of them could have more children outside of marriage.

But then came Oksana, followed by the birth of Lucy, and everything changed. And after the separation between Mel and Oksana, things would change again: the woman, in fact, before he signed an agreement whereby it undertook to give up on behalf of the little Icon to enter the Trust Fund, compared to a severance pay of 8 million dollars, and I repeat $ 8 million. And then he changed his mind.


It appears that the lawyers have convinced not to believe the explanations of Mel, who spoke only opportunity for tax purposes, and they did not inherit the ability to flash 8 but as many as 50 million dollars, compared to one-eighth of Trust, estimated $ 400 million. And here the numbers take off.

Gibson has said and repeated to the former $ 400 million that are neither in heaven nor on earth nor in his Trust, but it seems that he has not believed ... and then off to class debate, gentlemen.

To the great delight of the lawyers, of course.

No comments:

Post a Comment